Washington, D. C.
310.826.7474
EDUCATION
Antonin Scalia Law School, George Mason University, (J.D. 1998)
University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign (B.S.E.E., Electrical Engineering, 1994)
Jonathan Link is a partner at Russ August & Kabat, specializing in intellectual property litigation with an emphasis on matters before the United States International Trade Commission. Prior to joining Russ August & Kabat, Mr. Link was an attorney with Morris, Manning & Martin LLP, where he was a member of the Intellectual Property group.
Mr. Link has significant experience counseling clients through patent infringement actions before the United States International Trade Commission (ITC) and in federal district courts. Mr. Link has represented complainants, respondents, and third-parties in a number of ITC investigations, including through trial and post-trial Commission review. Mr. Link also has significant experience litigating patent infringement actions in federal district courts and proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”). Mr. Link has been recognized as one of “The World’s Leading Patent Practitioners” for litigation, ITC litigation and PTAB practice by Intellectual Asset Management 2014-2017.
Mr. Link earned his law degree from the Antonin Scalia Law School at George Mason University. During law school, Mr. Link worked as an examiner at the USPTO and as a patent agent at Hunton, Andrews, Kurth (then Hunton & Williams). Mr. Link earned his Bachelors of Science in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of Illinois in 1994.
Admitted
- State Bar of Virginia (1998)
- D.C. Bar (1999)
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (1997)
Recent Matters
- Samsung v. NVIDIA*—represented NVIDIA in the Eastern District of Virginia. Won jury trial findings of non-infringement of patent at issue.*
- InterDigital Communications v. ZTE*—Represented InterDigital in multi-patent infringement case relating to 3G and 4G mobile technologies in the District of Delaware and the ITC.*
- Rambus v LSI, Seagate – Represented LSI and Seagate Technologies for alleged patent infringement by them as well as numerous other semiconductor manufacturers and their customers. The ITC found no violation as the patents were found to be either not infringed or invalid. *
- LSI, Agere Systems v. 27 Semiconductor Manufacturers – Represented LSI and Agere Systems alleging patent infringement against 27 semiconductor manufacturers. Obtained numerous settlements for the client on favorable terms. *
- Verizon v. Vonage – Represented Verizon in the Eastern District of Virginia in successfully obtaining a jury verdict of infringement of three voice-over-internet protocol (VOIP) patents and an injunction against Vonage. *
- MercExchange v. eBay – Represented MercExchange in the Eastern District of Virginia in obtaining a jury verdict of infringement of an online auction patent and an injunction against eBay.*